Search Site: 
                  TV Listings
 
July 2009
Su M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

 
 
Publication Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Opinion

Print | E-mail | Comment (No comments posted.) | Rate | Text Size

Cock-fights

Published: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:51 AM CST
The recent arrest of more than a dozen people in Greene County on cock-fighting charges leaves us grappling for a proper word to describe our feelings.

Appalling.

Disgusting.

Barbaric.

Shameful.

We understand one of the arrestees even made the comment to arresting officers that since “God gave us dominion over the earth, I don’t see what the big deal is.”


Jeez, where do we start?

First, we wonder why anyone who would pit two animals of the same species against each other — and fit them with more lethal weapons (spurs) to “overcome” that natural aversion of a member of a given species to kill another member.

Sport?

Some sport, when the promoters of said “sport” have to modify creatures over whom, as the individual noted, “God gave dominion” to make sure these creatures that would not otherwise kill each other, do so.

We recognize the practices of cock-fighting, and dog-fighting for that matter, are hardly unknown as sports throughout the world. Indeed, a cookbook featuring foods from the Philippines even has a recipe for “defeated rooster,” as the loser of a cock-fight.

But virtually every place in which cock-fighting is popular is considered an under-developed country in the Third World.

You know, uncivilized. And no place we figure any American not engaged in charity, humanitarian or mission work would want to live.

And these dozen-plus think it’s okay for Arkansas?

As an aside, such activity goes a long way toward unraveling the improved image of The Natural State through the presence of two serious candidates for president with close ties to Arkansas.

In addition, we are reminded, in this cock-fighting case as well as the earlier, more widely publicized case of professional football player Michael Vick and dog-fighting, of something very sinister in the use of animals for entertainment through pain inflicted on them:

According to numerous published reports, abuse and intentional infliction of harm on animals is a significant predictor of the tendency to inflict harm on people, from sexual abuse of children to mass school shootings by guys like Luke Woodham, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris.

We seriously question whether the current penalties under the Arkansas Code, Annotated for animal cruelty, as misdemeanors, are stringent enough. Yet we remember the handy defeat at the polls in  2002 of an initiated proposal to make animal cruelty a felony.

This case, as well as that of Michael Vick,  suggests to us that the idea needs revisiting. So we urge supporters of that proposed Arkansas Animal Cruelty Act to get together with opponents of that act to iron out concerns over livestock and poultry issues that led to its defeat at that time.

We like our meat on the table.

But we don’t like our chickens — or our dogs — to have to battle each other to the death for someone else’s fun.

That’s because we don’t think that’s what the Almighty had in mind when He gave us “dominion over the earth.”



 
 

Article Rating

Current Rating: 3.5 of 6 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of paragoulddailypress.com.

SMCCORD wrote on Feb 27, 2008 2:36 PM:

" First of all, to compare these men to child molesters and murderers is absurd. They are no such thing. These men have families just like everyone else. Second, the Michael Vick case is completely different than this. These chickens are well taken care of and are fed every single day. These animals are cared for just as well as anyone would care for their family dog. The treatment of these animals is no different than that of a professional boxer. They are conditioned and trained and are put in the fight to win, not to be killed. Boxers inflict intentional harm and abuse to their bodies everyday with the intention of winning. To say that these chickens would not kill each other without the help of "lethal weapons" is completely wrong. If you put a hundred "cocks" in a pin and left them alone, in the end there would only be one left standing. It's in their blood. Their bodies are equipped with natural weapons called spurs that enable them to fight. They are just like any other male species, they compete over their hens and food to survive. It's instinct. If you don't agree with what these men are doing, fine, but don't judge them based on what hobby they choose to partake in. "

harryb88 wrote on Feb 27, 2008 5:32 PM:

" A society can be judged by how it treats its animals, children, and elderly. Well, that is down score for Greene County in one category. What is next? Rabbit fights. I hear their males do not get along. Maybe a good old free for all with bunnies is just the ticket. Maybe they can be armed to create excitement, bobbing and weaving and talking some trash for the fans, no wait that is for roosters. "

heythere wrote on Mar 5, 2008 12:25 PM:

" who cares? i guess you'd rather see there feathers boiled off of them like big chicken companies do. at least this way they have a fighting chance. there are bigger issues in today's society then cockfighting "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.
Return to: Opinion « | Home « | Top of Page ^
Poll
How will the new seat belt law affect your seat belt wearing?
I will start to wear my seat belt
I will continue to not wear my seat belt
I always wear my seat belt
View Results

Copyright © 2009 Paragould Daily Press - www.paragoulddailypress.com.
All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
Terms of Use